Archive for January, 2009

The Mind of Senior Management–What’s going on?

Saturday, January 17th, 2009

 

Senior Marketers: Research, Innovation Key In ’09

 

Karlene Lukovitz, Jan 13, 2009 09:02 AM

 

Richard Guha of Max Brand EquityMarketing budgets may be on the chopping block, but market research and innovation are high up on the priorities list, according to results of the newly released “Top Marketing Trends for 2009″ survey from the Marketing Executives Networking Group (MENG). 

 

Meanwhile, while alternative energy and green marketing are still hot, senior marketers seem less preoccupied with global warming and health awareness as key issues–and rather disillusioned with off-shoring and the practical realities of Web 2.0.

The second annual survey from MENG, a not-for-profit group comprising more than 2,000 senior marketing professionals (VP or higher title) and spanning all industries and marketing disciplines, was conducted online by Anderson Analytics. The emailed questionnaire, sent Nov. 15, pulled a 36% response rate (643 respondents) over a 30-day period.

Half (51%) of responding senior marketers said they believe their budgets will be decreased this year, 38% expect no impact and 11% expect an increase. One-quarter are not filling open staff positions, 22% are hiring only incremental staff, and 19% are reducing staff — although 34% report no anticipated effect on staffing plans.

At the same time, more than three-quarters said that use of market research will either remain the same (39%) or increase (39%), versus 22% indicating probable cutbacks in this area. In addition, 72% indicated stability (51%) or increased focus (21%) in innovation and R&D efforts.

Historically, most companies have failed to act on their knowledge that those that invest in marketing and R&D during recessions are likely to emerge with larger market shares, notes Richard Guha, founder and partner in marketing consultancy firm Max Brand Equity and MENG board chairman. However, this survey seems to indicate that this time around, more are compensating for marketing budget cuts made in some areas by “stepping up innovation,” he tells Marketing Daily.

“I think it’s critical to go on the offense while the competition is hiding,” commented one responding marketing executive in the survey. “Finding inexpensive ways to gain competitive advantage and grow share is critical to longer-term success when the economy starts to recover.”

Another respondent noted, however, that “too much innovation today is based on non-disciplined approaches (ad hoc, subjective, limited research) due to lack of time and/or budget. The result is poor success rates, lack of confidence in the innovation function, and too much employee turnover. More time and effort needs to be devoted to determining what innovation opportunities exist and properly defining the requirements before ideation, concept development and product development occur.”

Customer Retention, ROI Get Greater Emphasis Among 62 marketing concepts included in the survey, customer satisfaction ranked first, cited as being of major importance by the greatest number of senior marketers (79% this year). Customer satisfaction also ranked #1 in last year’s survey (cited by 75%).

Customer retention again came in second, and gained 11 percentage points (cited by 76% this year). Marketing ROI gained 12 percentage points (cited by 65%), to rise from seventh to third in the concept rankings.

Other high-ranking concepts this year, in order, are brand loyalty and segmentation (each cited by 61%), quality (56%), search engine optimization (48%), competitive intelligence, data mining and lead generation (each cited by 43%), word-of-mouth (42%), alternative energy (41%), mobile communications, electronic media and green marketing (each cited by 40%).

Among these top-ranked concepts, lead generation and alternative energy were among the greatest gains in emphasis (each up 10 percentage points since last year).

Presumably reflecting current economic conditions, other concerns seeing notably increased emphasis include credit availability (up by 33 rankings, to #23), housing markets (up 14 rankings, to #30) and trade deficits (up 11 rankings, to #49).

When factor analysis was used to group the 62 concepts into 15 key areas, these areas ranked in the following order: marketing basics, SEO, personalization, innovative branding, viral/WOM, green marketing, multicultural/ethnic issues, new media, breakdown of old media, macroeconomics, tech strategy, social issues, time starvation, outsourcing and other. (The last three, as well as breakdown of old media, showed declines in importance versus last year.)

Global Warming, Off-Shoring Decline In Stress

Concepts that saw the greatest declines in emphasis included global warming, which dropped by 14 rankings (to #40); time-shifting (TiVo) (down 12 rankings to #50), media fragmentation (down 10 rankings to #21), and immigration and off-shoring (each dropped by nine places, to #58 and #57, respectively).

Guha believes that in most of these cases, the declines in perceived importance reflect a sense that “we’re going to put some things on hold while we sort out the economic situation–we’ll focus first on putting out the fires.”

However, the off-shoring de-emphasis seems to reflect growing disillusionment. There appears to be no growth in off-shoring any marketing functions (under 20% of respondents reported use of off-shoring in both years’ surveys). Furthermore, this year, 58% agreed that off-shoring “is not as profitable as others think, and is fraught with risk”–up from 49% agreeing with that statement last year.

Despite economic pressures, marketers also seem underwhelmed by outsourcing as a solution. Just 15% cited outsourcing as being of major importance (down two percentage points from last year, to rank #46), and just 10% cited “selective” outsourcing as very important (down one point, to rank #55).

Web 2.0: Marketing Can’t Do It Alone

Just one-quarter of senior marketers rank Web 2.0 issues of major importance (up two points, but ranking at #33 among the 62 concepts), and nearly 20% cited “Web 2.0″ as the buzz phrase they are most tired of hearing. (Runners-up included “social networking,” “social media” and “blogging.”)

“Web 2.0 is a lot more complicated than many companies realize,” says Guha. “The point is interactivity with customers, and achieving that requires fundamental change throughout the organization–which by and large is not happening. So I think a lot of marketers are frustrated because they’re expected to sprinkle marketing pixie dust and somehow make Web 2.0 happen for their companies.”

On the customer/prospect demographics front, 78% cited Baby Boomers as most critical (versus 72% last year), followed by women (64%), Hispanic/Latino (60%), Gen X (53%) and Gen Y (52%). Perceived importance of Gen X and Gen Y grew significantly (up from 40% and 41%, respectively, last year).

Internationally, China continues to be considered the most important market (cited by 48%), followed by India (17%).

On the inspiration/ideas front, Good to Great remains the most widely read and recommended book. Seth Godin remains the favorite marketing/business guru, followed by Warren Buffet and Malcolm Gladwell.

 

Tech Talk For the New Year (from Information Week)

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

Gartner: IT Has ‘No Moral Basis’ To Monitor Facebook Usage

Posted by Bob Evans, Dec 24, 2008 11:24 AM 

Does your IT team spend any time monitoring Facebook usage by employees? If so, you’re just wasting your time and reinforcing the reputation that you and your team are busybodies, says Gartner analyst Brian Prentice. But his argument gets downright weird when he asserts such actions are an attempt “to deny people the right to reclaim a semblance of a personal life.”

For myself, I think employers should encourage employees to experiment with not just Facebook but all manner of Web 2.0 and other technologies for two big reasons: First, simply because those tools are becoming effective and often essential elements in establishing stronger connections with customers, prospects, partners, and opinion-shapers; and second, more and more customers and prospects are spending time within those social and professional networks, so shouldn’t your employees be mingling there as well? Of course, proper guidelines must be set for such usage but that’s hardly an issue reserved exclusively for online communities — I mean, do you have a formal policy for quantity of daily bathroom visits?

In his blog post, which carries the headline “Butt Out IT!”, Gartner’s Prentice begins by making some fairly logical and reasoned arguments:

Secondly, how can you be certain that pure social interaction doesn’t support a business objective? If Jenny from sales is “friending” her prospect list or posting some videos on the fun wall of her clients are you really, really sure you want to stop this type of activity?

But he and his argument jump the rails when he goes into a rant about the blurring of any distinction between a personal life and a work life and he lays the blame for that squarely on IT organizations. Now, wouldn’t you think that the head of sales would have something to say about what tools the sales organization gets, and how those tools are to be used? Prentice, however, seems to think it’s all due to the meddling and muddling twits in IT:

But last, and most definitely not least, have you ever stopped to ask yourself exactly whose time you think these people are “wasting?” Hands up — who here puts in a strict 40-hour week? Anyone? Anyone?I seriously doubt that many people are answering in the affirmative because for the vast majority of knowledge workers the 40-hour work week has gone the way of the employer-funded pension plan. In reality we’re probably logging something closer to 50-60 hours a week. And who helped empower this reality? You did Mr./Ms. IT person!

Funny, but I can’t seem to recall as much angst expressed by IT departments over the appropriation of employees’ personal time when laptops, email systems, Blackberry’s and VPNs were being deployed as I’m now hearing about the potential for Facebook to chew into work time.

 

Prentice’s piece makes some interesting points and it’s worth reading, but only as a conversation-starter and not as a policy guide because as the excerpts above indicate, his sense of what IT organizations are all about, and what they should or should not be focused upon, seems rather sketchy. And the Orwellian stuff about how technology and the people who deploy and manage it are somehow responsible for obliterating leisure time and freedom is somewhere between silly and paranoid.